View another random question/answer
20.17 Questioner: I’m assuming at the start of one of these cycles there could have been either a positive polarisation that would generally occur over the 25,000 years or a negative polarisation. Is the reason for the negative polarisation and the shortening of the cycle the influx of entities from Mars who had already polarised somewhat negatively?
Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. There was not a strong negative polarisation due to this influx. The lessening of the life span was due primarily to the lack of the building up of positive orientation. When there is no progress, those conditions which grant progress are gradually lost. This is one of the difficulties of remaining unpolarized. The chances, shall we say, of progress become steadily less.
66.17 Questioner: I assume that the reason for assuming the distortions appropriate would be that these distortions would aid the entity in its reaching its ultimate objective, which is a movement along the path of evolution in the desired polarity. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.
The original Law of One books are copyright ©1982, 1984, 1998 L/L Research. The Ra Contact books are copyright ©2018 L/L Research and Tobey Wheelock.
This site copyright ©2003–2024 Tobey Wheelock.
Questions? Comments? Email me: tw at law of one dot info.